On how to depict St. Marc
Year mention: 1617
Subject:
St. Mark
Conflict:
Outer appearance
Visual tradition/Artistic model vs. written Tradition/History
Criticism:

St. Mark would have been of the height and age of a mature man

Agent:
Molanus, Johannes
Frostispiece of Molanus, De historia sanctarum imaginum et picturarum (1617), Antwerp, Gasparus Bellerus
Frontispiece of Molanus, De historia sanctarum imaginum et picturarum (1617), Antwerp, Gasparus Bellerus
Augsburg, Staats- und Stadtbibliothek — Th H 1475. Digital Reproduction: München, Bayerische Staatsbibliothek, 2015.

Molanus discusses the exterior features of St. Mark, who would have been of the height and age of a mature man.

“Chapter 43 says that Mark was of the height and age of a mature man. In Simeon, the Metaphraste, the account of him gives several pieces of information about his portrait.”

“Capite quadragesimo tertio habet. Marcum staturae et aetatis statae fuisse arque semicanum. Pluraque de huius effigie habet historia ipsius apud Simeonem Metaphrasten”

Model to follow

Symeon the Metaphrast

Date mention
1617

Historical Location
Leuven

Iconclass Number
11H(Mark)

Source
Molanus, De historia sanctarum imaginum et picturarum (1617), book 2, ch. 56, 193
Literature

Molanus 1996, 288.

Permanent Link
https://www.sacrima.eu/case/on-how-to-depict-st-marc/