SACRIMA Digital Atlas

Conflict
Subject
Person
Date of Artwork
Sources
Sort by
 
 
  • Frostispiece of Molanus, De historia sanctarum imaginum et picturarum (1617), Antwerp, Gasparus Bellerus

    Virgin Mary should not be depicted in pain while labouring



    Molanus argues that a recurrent depiction of the Virgin Mary during labour is incorrect and deviates from the Holy Scriptures and the teachings of the Church.

    Conflict
    Not corresponding to Scriptures
    Mention
    Leuven, 1617
    Subject
    Birth of Christ ; Midwives ; Virgin Mary
  • Apocryphal stories about the Virgin Mary and Christ



    Molanus disapproves of artworks depicting apocryphal stories of Jesus and the Virgin Mary.

    Conflict
    Not corresponding to Scriptures Untruthfulness/Not probable/Not corresponding to history
    Mention
    Leuven, 1617
    Subject
    Jesus Christ ; Story of Joachim and Anne ; Virgin Mary
  • Frostispiece of Molanus, De historia sanctarum imaginum et picturarum (1617), Antwerp, Gasparus Bellerus

    Artists follow the traditions of depicting Christ, Mary, and Apostles either by studying other paintings or the authorities



    Molanus argues that artists should follow the pictorial tradition set by other artists or study the written sources regarding the subject.

    Conflict
    Visual tradition/Artistic model vs. written tradition/history
    Mention
    Leuven, 1617
    Subject
    Apostles ; Jesus Christ ; Virgin Mary
  • Frostispiece of Molanus, De historia sanctarum imaginum et picturarum (1617), Antwerp, Gasparus Bellerus

    The depiction of the Virgin Mary



    Molanus refers to Epiphanius for the correct depiction of the Virgin Mary: as a humble and graceful woman.

    Conflict
    Outer appearance Visual tradition/Artistic model vs. written Tradition/History
    Mention
    Leuven, 1617
    Subject
    Virgin Mary
  • Obscene offense to the image of the Virgin Mary

    Aragon


    Conflict
    Derision/Blasphemy
    Mention
    Aragon, 1580s?
    Subject
    Virgin Mary
  • Frostispiece of Molanus, De historia sanctarum imaginum et picturarum (1617), Antwerp, Gasparus Bellerus

    Images of the Trinity in the bosom of the Virgin Mary are devoid of beauty and religion



    Molanus criticises a particular type of statue of the Virgin Mary that could be opened up and held an image of the Trinity in this inner compartment. According to him, this creates a wrong illusion about the relationship between Virgin Mary and the Trinity.

    Conflict
    Monstrosity/Unacceptable configuration Not corresponding to Scriptures Not corresponding with Church teaching/dogma
    Mention
    Leuven, 1617
    Subject
    Trinity ; Virgin Mary
  • The Virgin Mary is always a virgin and free of sin



    Molanus explains the iconography of Virgin Mary trambling the Devil with her feet as the depiction of her life free of sin and her virginity.

    Conflict
    Visual tradition/Artistic model vs. written Tradition/History
    Mention
    Leuven, 1617
    Subject
    Virgin Mary
  • Frostispiece of Molanus, De historia sanctarum imaginum et picturarum (1617), Antwerp, Gasparus Bellerus

    Matters uncertain in the sources, but whose depiction is judged probable by the painters



    Molanus concludes that a certain pictorial tradition of an unestablished story does not mean this story has become certain, but that this way of depicting is most probable.

    Conflict
    Not corresponding to Scriptures Visual tradition/Artistic model vs. written Tradition/History
    Mention
    Leuven, 1617
    Subject
    Flight into Egypt ; Saul ; Virgin Mary